krottropical.blogg.se

5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii for stills
5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii for stills








5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii for stills
  1. 5D MARK III VS 6D MARK II FOR STILLS UPGRADE
  2. 5D MARK III VS 6D MARK II FOR STILLS FULL
  3. 5D MARK III VS 6D MARK II FOR STILLS PRO

So if 5dmk2 was like $1000 then I agree pick 5dmk2 but with what they selling 6d for, I would pick 6d. Here used 5dmk will sell for like $1300-$1400 while you can get brand new 6d for $1300. Or you can get a quality ND filter, and make stunning long exposure shots, at daylight - without that filter, no matter wich camera is better, you can't make these shots. Answer: The 5D MkII is quite an old camera, and although it was considered a standard for DSLR filmmakers because of its full-frame sensor and ability to use Canon’s best lenses, the crop sensor 7D was also quite popular.

5D MARK III VS 6D MARK II FOR STILLS PRO

5d mark III is a more pro body on the other hand 6d mark II is a newer camera. I am not doing any landscape photography I will use it for studio work and a few social events for online websites.

5D MARK III VS 6D MARK II FOR STILLS UPGRADE

Now its nice that the 6D has better HIGH ISO performance, but without that Tripod, it does not really matter, because you won't shoot night pictures at 1/20sec, but at 30s, and for that you NEED a tripod, or something that holds your camera. I have saved some money for an upgrade of my 80d. Its the photograper, and his (rest) gear that makes that difference.įor example, for that $500 you could get a nice tripod, and use it to make nice night shots. In all honesty, comparing camera specs side by side does not make that much difference. The question is: Is the 6D that much better for your needs, that is it worth the $500 extra, or can you get something for the 5D Mk II for $500, that makes it a better deal. Now if you can't afford the 5D Mk III, and looking at the prizes, the 5D Mk II should be around $2100, and the 6D around $2600. If you really want to feel like upgrading, then the 5D Mk III is the only way to go, it is the only (not 1 Series) camera realy superior to the 7D. If you are coming from a 7D tough, the AF system of both these cameras is worse then that of the 7D.ĪND THAT could make you being disappointed. The 6D is a good camera for sure, but (as my friend also said) its not that better, that its wort to "upgrade". In many respects, the 6D is the unofficial replacement to the 5D, as both cameras offer largely similar core capabilities and performance.

5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii for stills 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii for stills

5D MARK III VS 6D MARK II FOR STILLS FULL

The 22.3 MP full frame sensor, 61 cross-type autofocus points, and. This camera replaced the popular 5D Mark II and is a far superior piece of machinery. Canon’s 5D Mark III has been the workhorse body of many professional photographers since it first came out in March 2012. My 5D Mk II makes me perfectly happy, the only thing I would upgrade to is the MK III. Canon 6D Mark II vs Canon 5D Mark III In today’s post, we will compare two semi-professional digital SLR camera from Canon, the Canon 5D Mark III, and the Canon 6D Mark II. The Canon 5D Mark III and Canon 6D are excellent full frame options. Sure the 24-70 is newer, more recent technology, but is it really better?!










5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii for stills